Ryan Giggs has had a busy couple of months. As if battling salacious reports of bedroom shenanigans with Z-list reality TV ‘stars’ and his sister-in-law wasn’t enough, the Manchester United veteran has become an unwitting poster-boy for the growing movement of discontent surrounding the super-injunctions.

The Daily Star are obsessed with Ryan Giggs
By suing Twitter, he’s also been at the forefront of the debate on what constitutes libel in the social media age, and has even been mentioned in Parliament. Not bad for someone whose sole goal in life thus far has been to hurtle down Man U’s left wing and deliver perfectly weighted crosses to the incredibly wide forehead of Wayne Rooney.
Now Giggsy appears to have been awarded one of the UK press’ highest accolades: the most consecutive front pages for an individual EVER. No doubt fired up by the chance to expose the injustices of the super-injunction system, the Daily Star has run 14 consecutive Ryan Giggs-related front pages. That’s not just mentions on the front page (as he got on day 15 when he was ‘relegated’ to the sidebar by Ashley Cole – the shame), but actual splashes.
The only let-up between the 6th and 21st of June was from the Daily Star Sunday, which cut Giggsy some slack by replacing him with P-Middy (that’s the Duchess of Cambridge’s sister to you and me).
To put this into context, the Daily Express – for whom Princess Diana is pretty much its raison d’etre – only published 11 consecutive front pages following her death in 1997 according to The Media Blog.
Quite why the Daily Star appears to have been caught up in this incredible rut is unclear. The affairs of global sports megastars David Beckham and Tiger Woods have not received nearly the scrutiny awarded to Giggs who, until now, has held next to no interest for anyone aside from fans of Manchester Untied (and occasionally, Wales).
Giggs has always been pitched as a ‘model professional’, dull to his core and of no ‘use’ to the tabloids. Now the illusion appears to have been shattered, perhaps the Star felt it needed to get its money’s worth? Or perhaps by turning the screw so relentlessly, the Star is sending a stark warning to anyone in the public eye who refuses to ‘play the game’ that they will face a terrible vengeance should they ever slip up?
Whatever the reason, the exercise in Giggs-mania has surely pushed the ‘public interest’ argument to its limit in more ways than one.